|
|
 |
|
Howe Park School
Bowland Drive
Milton Keynes
Bucks
MK4 2SH
Assessment Date: 25th September 2007
Summary
Howe Park School provides a well-designed, welcoming and flexible
learning environment for its pupils. There have been considerable
changes since the school opened only eight years ago: for example, a
nursery was added last year, and the school no longer has a Year 3 class
because of local reorganisation. The biggest challenge facing the school
has been pupil and staff mobility, and there are signs that these are
now beginning to stabilise. Parents are very happy with the school, and
those with children having to transfer to Middle schools were reluctant
to move their children away from Howe Park.
In the last year, behaviour inside and outside school has improved
greatly, and it is clear that relationships between parents, carers,
staff and pupils are happy and based on trust and positive expectations.
The Headteacher has built up a strong and committed staff team, with
teaching and support staff who are highly motivated to contribute to
school development, and keen to put new training into practice. The
school is fortunate in having experienced and professional governors
from a variety of backgrounds, who work hard for the school and make
regular use of an open invitation to visit school at any time.
All connected with the school agree that "all children have a human
right to be educated alongside their peers" (SEN policy). The school
keeps detailed records of pupil attainment and an exemplary provision
map for pupils requiring additional help. Teachers and LSAs identify
able children while they are still in the Foundation Stage, and provide
enrichment activities in academic subjects, art, music and sports.
Children arriving from other countries are made welcome, and efforts
are made to draw on their home cultures for the benefit of all the
pupils. These children are given regular and intensive 1:1 help, and
records show that most of these make rapid progress in English.
Howe Park is very much an Inclusive School. I am of the opinion that
the school fully meets the standard required by the Inclusion Quality
Mark. There are only minor areas requiring development and the school is
aware of these.
Assessor: Barbara Curry
Findings confirmed by Inclusion Quality Mark Ltd:
………………………………………….
Joe McCann MBA NPQH
Executive Head
Inclusion Quality Mark
Assessment Report
Inclusion Quality Mark
|
Name of School: |
Howe Park School |
|
Headteacher: |
Mrs Ros Jacklin |
|
Date of assessment: |
25th September 2007 |
|
Final assessor/s: |
|
|
Successful: |
|
| Context
of the school and sources of data. e.g PANDA, SEF, Ofsted report
The last Ofsted report 2003, which was very positive, is now
out-of-date and the school’s structure has changed since then:
there is now a nursery and no Year 3.
Data updated from RaiseOnline for new school year:
Attendance 2006-7 was 95.33, which is good.
There have been no permanent exclusions in the life of the
school.
Free School meals 16.8%
EAL pupils currently 15% but expected to rise as new pupils
are assessed at the start of this school year.
Pupil mobility 28% per annum: this is significantly high.
The school is housed in a modern building, only eight years
old, situated in a pleasant new housing estate. It is a First
School originally having had a Year 3 cohort, but in the last
year, reorganisation of schools in Milton Keynes has resulted in
the loss of this year group and the addition of a Nursery.
The new Headteacher has been in post since September 2006 and
is supported by a similarly new SMT.
|
|
Portfolio and other supporting evidence
Documentation seen:
·1 Ofsted report
2003
·2 Heads’ reports
to Governors
·3 Newsletters and
information sent to parents
·4 SMT minutes
·5 Policy
documents e.g. Special Needs Policy
·6 Teachers’
planning
·7 Pupil
attainment records and analyses
·8 School’s
tracking documents
·9 Provision maps
·10 IEPs
Interviews:
·1 Headteacher/
SENCO
·2 Assistant
Headteacher/ Assessment co-ordinator/ Staff governor
·3 Foundation
Stage co-ordinator
·4 Two NQTs
·5 EAL support
teacher
·6 Six parents
informally
·7 Chair of
Parents’ Association
·8 Chair of
Governors
·9 Six pupils
informally
·10 Twelve
selected pupils spanning statutory age span of school
·11 Local
Authority trainer for MDAs
Observations:
·1 Harvest
assembly attended by nursery children and a large number
of parents.
·2 Lunch in
canteen
·3 Lunchtime play
followed by "Wake up and Shake up" with the whole school
·4 Foundation
Stage session
·5 Tour of school
with observations in classrooms en route
·6 Displays around
school
|
| Pupil
Progress
Strengths:
·1 Time is
allocated for staff to share information about pupils’
progress, regularly. This includes transition between
classes and phases.
·2 Staff
understand that not all pupil progress is easy to
measure: for example, socialisation, but they are able
to discuss this kind of progress and regard it as
important.
·3 New mid-year or
mid-phase arrivals at school are assessed as soon as
possible by LSAs to ensure they start making progress as
soon as possible.
·4 Pupils are
involved in target-setting: for example there are clear
displays in every classroom giving targets under "must,
could and should" headings, and child-friendly IEPs
sometimes use pictures instead of written words to make
them accessible.
·5 There is
constant monitoring of what works in classrooms and what
doesn’t: for example, the school has recently introduced
"Read-Write" because Jolly Phonics did not seem to
develop children’s ability to synthesise sounds.
·6 Recording of
pupil progress and analysis of results is done promptly
after May assessments, to ensure the new school year is
able to respond immediately to information gathered.
·7 The SMT is
clear where additional support is needed, for staff and
pupils alike. This is because there is a culture of
regular formal classroom observations.
·8 There is a
clear link between recorded progress and targeted
provision: for example in the excellent Summary of
Provision document outlining support in each phase under
Wave 1, 2 and 3. This is accompanied by individual
recording sheets to show progress under Wave provision,
using teacher/parent friendly language and providing a
useful visual summary for each child. These documents
have been used as exemplars in other schools by the
local authority.
·9 The school
knows exactly where progress has not been as good as it
should: for example it has identified too great a
boy-girl difference in performance, and that not enough
pupils are achieving level 3 in writing. Work is now in
progress to address these.
Areas for development:
·1 Those
already identified in the SDP.
|
| Pupil
attitude, values & personal development
Strengths:
·1 The pupils are
very happy at school, and they are confident that staff
will handle any bullying: but most pupils do not know of
any incidences of this.
·2 Pupils
understand that sanctions will be applied for
misbehaviour: "We have to be good or we will be sent to
the Headteacher", and "He had to write a letter to say
sorry".
·3 Parents are
confident that the school teaches the attitudes and
values that they teach at home.
·4 Pupils enjoy
learning, and say "We learn a lot because the teachers
help us".
·5 Pupils are
proud of what they can do, and link this with rewards:
"I have moved up a level in my reading, so I can choose
two books from the library".
·6 Pupils love the
incentives given for good work and good behaviour. They
enjoy being given responsible jobs such as taking the
register to the office or handing out the snacks. They
all love "Golden Time".
·7 Children
understand the needs of new pupils, and several were
able to describe how they had been "buddies" to new
arrivals: "We care for them and show them round the
school".
·8 Children
observed in class are well-behaved, attentive and
"on-task".
·9 Children in the
playground understand the different zones for different
kinds of play, and respect each other’s needs for space
and safety.
Area for development:
·1 There are no
significant areas for development.
|
|
Leadership & Management
Strengths:
·2 The school has
made rapid progress in its fulfilment of the Inclusion
elements since the first draft was submitted. This is
because governors and staff are truly "on board": the
Headteacher has inspired the whole school team to work
together, and a working party was set up to produce an
action plan, which is continuing on schedule.
·3 The School
Development Plan is a team-effort and correctly
identifies the major areas for work in the next three
years. INSET days include group exercises which involve
all staff, however new and inexperienced.
·4 Monitoring is
part of the school’s natural cycle of work and is
accepted by all.
·5 There is an
ethos of honesty and trust among the staff: all are keen
to develop professionally, and all agree that there is
always something which can be improved.
·6 The SMT
believes in honesty in its analysis and presentation of
school strengths and weaknesses: in this way, governors
are able to ask the right questions, and understand the
school’s priorities.
·7 Senior teachers
are given responsibility for some training and
performance management of staff: this develops skills
for future succession and for personal professional
development.
·8 Every member of
staff is valued and feels valued: for example, MDAs have
benefited from training, which they and their trainer
agree has transformed playground behaviour. The school
caretaker now also leads popular lunchtime football
sessions in addition to being much praised by staff for
his DIY skills.
·9 Staff work
together to provide good role models for pupils,
everywhere in the building and outside.
·10 Governors
visit school regularly and even have a key so that they
can visit at times to suit them. There is a high level
of expertise and active involvement of governors in
school life and management.
Areas for development:
·1 To
professionally develop new SMT members, consider
rotating the chairing and minute-taking of SMT meetings.
|
|
Staffing system & organisation
Strengths:
·2 New members of
staff are well-supported, by carefully-chosen mentors
and by the most experienced LSAs.
·3 New members of
staff are encouraged to get to know the school before
their official start date.
·4 All members of
the teaching staff feel their opinion is valued, and
that they have a role to play in suggesting ideas for
school development.
·5 One teacher
commented, "The staff is a fantastic team", and indeed
they do appear to work together seamlessly and
harmoniously.
·6 Staff
professional development is valued, and all staff are
given annual performance reviews, their statutory PPA
and NQT time, and are offered training to match personal
development needs.
·7 The new SMT
members have additional and sufficient non-contact time
to enable them to fulfil management and leadership
functions such as lesson observations and progress
analysis, as well as to attend training.
·8 The Headteacher
models care for her workforce and the importance of a
healthy worklife balance, for example, making sure NQTs
do not work too late at school.
·9 The Headteacher
understands the need to pace initiatives and training,
to ensure staff are not overloaded.
·10 Individual
members of staff are given opportunities to play to
their strengths: for example an HLTA is leading
provision for more able pupils and attends SMT meetings.
·11 Training for
the whole staff is followed up by monitoring by senior
staff, and extra support is given if needed.
·12 There is
consistency in policy implementation throughout the
school, whether this is written, or merely enshrined in
regular practice.
Areas for development:
·1 There are no
significant areas for development.
|
| The
Learning Environment
Strengths:
·2 The new
buildings are bright, airy and well-designed for
flexible use by young children. Children like the
"shared areas" between the curtained classrooms, because
of the variety of activities which are possible there.
·3 Parent love the
building, and value its safety and the opportunities for
learning it provides.
·4 Classroom and
corridor display values children’s work: much art work
is framed professionally, and all displays show a
consistently high quality of layout and design. Displays
are simple and uncluttered.
·5 The staffroom
affords an attractive relaxing space, and also a work
area for efficient use of PPA time.
·6 The outdoor
areas are well supplied with play equipment, and have
good shading in some areas nearer the buildings. There
are recesses which afford interesting play opportunities
but which can still be well supervised.
·7 Notices and
pictures around the school celebrate ethnic diversity,
and show greetings in different languages.
·8 Classrooms are
simply laid-out, with an uncluttered look and
easily-accessible resources. Children have plenty of
space to sit on the carpet or to work at tables in
groups. Interactive whiteboards are well positioned for
whole-class use.
Areas for development:
·1 There are no
significant areas for development except the joining-up
of the Foundation Stage outdoor play areas, which is
already planned.
|
|
Teaching & Learning
Strengths:
·2 Children enjoy
learning, and progress is good in most cases.
·3 Some new
arrivals, including EAL children, make excellent
progress very soon after joining the school.
·4 Parents are
very happy with their children’s progress, and
appreciate the information they are given by the school
to enable them to support their child’s learning
·5 Lessons include
regular "brain-breaks", water is available, and children
feel comfortable and listen well.
·6 There are
opportunities for group as well as individual work.
·7 There is plenty
of active learning: individual whiteboards were in use
in one class, body movement in another. In the
foundation stage class observed, children were handling
and using materials of different kinds to explore the
properties of shapes: this included cutting straws,
printing with paint and sponges, and jumping on large
shapes outdoors. In these ways, different learning
styles are planned for, and the need for young children
to develop fine and gross motor skills also accepted.
·8 Planning
incorporates layered objectives, so that lessons are
differentiated for children of different abilities.
·9 Planning for
LSAs is clear and they are often involved in planning
with the year-group teams: so they understand how they
can best help their allocated groups. In addition, they
are given freedom to use their own professional
expertise and adapt a lesson plan as necessary.
·10 LSAs share in
the continuous assessment of pupils and their
contributions are much valued by classteachers.
·11 Older pupils
are aware of their progress, and of what they need to do
to move forwards.
·12 The curriculum
is wide and practical: there was baking in one group,
making fruit smoothies in another, and evidence of some
gardening work by children.
·13 The quality of
teaching, learning, planning and assessment are
constantly monitored by SMT, who know exactly where
improvements need to be made, and provide ongoing
support and training.
Areas for development:
·1 There are
no significant areas for development.
|
|
Resources & ICT
Strengths:
·9 The school is
very well-resourced, and teachers say they are happy
with the materials and equipment they have in
classrooms.
·10 The use of
digital photography and "Digi blue" is in evidence
around the school.
·11 ICT is
currently being developed as a high priority in the SDP.
·12 Playtime is
enhanced by fixed and portable equipment outdoors.
·13 There is a
good accessibility plan with certain improvements
scheduled soon.
·14 Staff
volunteer expertise and materials: for example the EAL
teacher has organised multicultural events and even a "Bollywood"
dance.
Areas for development:
·14 ICT is
currently a "work in progress" and the school is
managing the development of a new computer suite, and
ICT accessibility for parents. It may benefit the ICT
co-ordinator to attend a SLICT course, because this will
help evaluate progress so far, and identify any new
areas for development.
|
| Parents
& Carers
Strengths:
·15 Parents and
carers are given very useful, clearly presented
information about what their child will be learning and
how they can help at home. Evening talks are well
attended, because the school understands parents’ needs:
for example by providing a crèche, and placing two talks
for different age groups after one another. A recent
"Read-Write" meeting attracted 50% of the parents.
·16 The newsletter
is attractive and readable.
·17 Parents are
very happy with the school. Parents commented: "They
handle things so well here: they integrate the children
well", "Teachers are friendly" and "The school is open
and warm".
·18 Parents/carers
noted that the staff was accessible: they knew that any
concerns would be dealt with immediately.
·19 One parent was
pleased with the positive approach the school had taken
with one of her children who had had problems
previously.
·20 Questionnaires
for parents/carers have a good rate of return (60% is
very high, bearing in mind that several children may be
in one family and represented by one return), and show
very positive responses.
·21 The Parents’
Association (FRIENDS) is well organised and well
supported, with 18 members currently named on the
committee. Events organised raise considerable sums of
money for the school, funding, for example, a playhouse,
markings in the playground, a shared play area in Y1 and
new books.
·22 FRIENDS
understands the need to reach out to new parents/carers,
and members approach new adults in the playground to
welcome and involve them. All new parents/carers are
given leaflets and flyers, and told that they are
automatically members.
·23 The good
working relationship between FRIENDS and the SMT is
exemplified by their understanding of the right times
and opportunities to approach parents and disseminate
information. FRIENDS avoids sending materials at the
start of term, to avoid overload.
Areas for development:
·1 The school’s
website is currently unavailable and needs completing.
The school is aware of this and one of the governors is
working on it. Many parents and carers have computers at
home, and there is scope to develop the already good
information-sharing in this way.
|
|
Governors, External Partners & Local Authority
Strengths:
·1 The school is
fortunate in having a very active and involved Chair,
who knows the school well, and visits informally and
often.
·2 Several
governors bring valuable strengths and professional
expertise to the running of the school: for example, a
qualified accountant chairs the finance committee, and a
teacher from another school chairs the curriculum
committee.
·3 The school has
worked hard to develop links with outside agencies:
Peripatetic professionals provide support for vulnerable
pupils and external agencies provide extracurricular
enrichment. Multi-agency work supports children at risk.
·4 The school
benefits from a supportive local authority: for example,
SENDIS has provided speech and language training for
staff, there has been advice from EMAS about
multicultural books and resources, the MDAs have enjoyed
and learned from their training. The Headteacher feels
that the local authority understands the need to retain
good staff with high-quality training.
·5 The school has
links with neighbouring schools and shares training and
informal advice.
·6 Transition is
well-managed.
Areas for development:
·1 There are
no significant areas for development.
|
| The
Community
Strengths:
·2 Sports, French
and music tuition is all provided by outside
organisations after hours at the school. This variety
and richness is unusual in a First School.
·3 The Headteacher
monitors the effectiveness of this provision as
carefully as she does the statutory curriculum.
·4 The school
FRIENDS association is active and successful in
involving parents and raising money for valuable
projects.
·5 The school
welcomes use of its premises by outside bodies,
including making rooms available for another school at
short notice.
·6 The school
takes part in community ventures such as a section of a
tapestry, the Easter hat parade etc.
·7 There are many
interesting local places for school visits and these are
used by the school: for example, Woburn Safari Park and
the Roald Dahl gallery.
Areas for development:
·1 Continue to
foster a positive and mutually-beneficial relationship
with the nearby playgroup/crèche.
·2 Develop the
school’s website to attract community contacts.
·3 Develop
links with the elderly.
|
|
I am of the opinion that the school fully meets the standard
required by the Inclusion Quality Mark. There are only minor
areas requiring development and the school is aware of these.
|
Signed:
Date:
|
|
 |
|
|